
"Glad to see there are no hard feelings. None on this side--you started up with us, we won, happens to a lot of people, we're cool now. No disgrace to lose out to Americans, of course.It's worth remembering, when reading the description of the poverty, hopelessness and inertia that characterize the alternate America of Bring the Jubilee, that the current relative vigour of life in the West is unusual in history.On the subject of books about a different outcome to the Revolution, I strongly recommend For Want of a Nail: If Burgoyne Had Won at Saratoga, by Robert Sobel, which is on Evelyn Leeper's list. Except for the subtitle and copyright page it purports to be more or less a freshman college history of North America after we lose the Revolution (not that that was in the cards, of course). Pretty much plausible and I like it a lot. It's one of my two favorite alternate history books, the other being Ward Moore's Bring the Jubilee.

The LA Examiner is Ken Layne and Matt Welch's new baby. Although the story is a grim one, I am glad to see that they are quick off the mark. The BBC website has now caught up.
In a sense there's nothing more to say about the killer. Just another one of the enemy. Good shooting from the El Al security guy, though. But I do hope they catch the "prankster" and reduce him to poverty.
LATER. I was too harsh there. Harnden is no worse than many. It is a disgrace to the profession of (British) journalism that they are ignoring one of the biggest social stories in the last ten years, but the disgrace falls to the whole profession and not to Harnden in particular. Every other criminological trend that comes to us from America is reported. Zero-tolerance, they know about; tagging they know about. But to find out about the justified popularity of concealed-carry you have to be a gun nut to start with.
Actually, according to Evelyn Leeper's list there are six what-if books that have the Colonists losing.
One I liked is The Two Georges. It's set in a present so felicitous as to have a diner on an airship remark, concerning these newfangled aeroplanes, that if travellers are in that much of a hurry they probably have not properly thought out the reasons for their journey. The plot concerns a not-very-credible racist/aristocratic conspiracy to kill the King while he visits his loyal American subjects, but the joy of the book lies in the cute touches. For instance Royal American Mounted Police flags fly at half mast outside police stations over the whole North American Union whenever one officer is killed. Sadly, that wouldn't be practicable in either the America or the Britain of our sorry excuse for a reality.
But perhaps things aren't so bad after all. Evelyn Leeper, in the link above, quotes Mark Keller as saying:
The most popular in French was "What if Napoleon had not been defeated?" which Keller said usually resulted in a better world than we have, while most American alternate histories show things as being worse. When someone in the audience asked why, Mark Olson replied, "We look at this as the best of all possible worlds, but the French know it isn't, because most people speak English."
Update: bug now stomped on in the Public Interest.
"Reviled red-zoners never have creditable reasons for holding opinions contrary to a Clintonite or a Kaletsky. Support for Israel, for example, is never a reasoned support, it's "unstinting", entirely without reservation on any point whatever of Israeli policy, utterly mindless. "That woman's been reading my mind again. Back when I wrote this post on British gun control I had, I really had, originally finished it with something very like this:
"Ah, she would say that. She's an American, and everyone knows what they're like." While it is conceded that even Americans might hold their opinions on tort reform, the Moldavian National Debt, or the care and feeding of lemurs as a result of argument or observation; it is well known that the only possible reason for supporting gun ownership is genetic. The Second Amendment is considered to be a part of American culture in the same sense of the word "culture" that describes ritual scarification and female circumcision.Then Blogger ate my final edit, and I was in a hurry and let it go.
Nor, sadly, do I belive believe there is anything like a silent majority of moderate and peace-loving Palestinians.
But, perhaps there might be one day. This is a start:
"Our legitimate cause was eventually hijacked by the despotic rule of the Palestinian Authority and by those who want to speak through violence."
I am, however, delighted to participate in spreading this meme; an "open source" article about open source products. Here is the recursive bit that really caught my interest:
"And so the experiment goes on. As a contribution to it, New Scientist and AlterNet have agreed to issue this article under a copyleft. That means you can copy it, redistribute it, reprint it in whole or in part, and generally play around with it as long as you, too, release your version under a copyleft and abide by the other terms and conditions in the licence. We also ask that you inform us of any use you make of the article, by e-mailing copyleft@newscientist.com.Won't it be interesting to see how far it gets? How far would this model be replicable, once the novelty has worn off? The parallels with blogging versus newspapers are obvious."One reason for doing so is that by releasing it under a copyleft, we can print the recipe for OpenCola without violating its copyleft. If nothing else, that demonstrates the power of the copyleft to spread itself. But there's another reason, too: to see what happens. To my knowledge this is the first magazine article published under a copyleft. Who knows what the outcome will be? Perhaps the article will disappear without a trace. Perhaps it will be photocopied, redistributed, re-edited, rewritten, cut and pasted onto websites, handbills and articles all over the world. I don't know -- but that's the point. It's not up to me any more. The decision belongs to all of us.
"THE INFORMATION IN THIS ARTICLE IS FREE. It may be copied, distributed and/or modified under the conditions set down in the Design Science License published by Michael Stutz at http://dsl.org/coplyleft/dsl.txt "
"Tony Blair has decided to send government "hit squads" to take over and "improve" under-performing blogs. It involves setting up a well-funded (at taxpayer expense) commission to determine why UK blogs are not performing well in the tables. This will involve MPs, ministers, and "experts", while not including any bloggers. They need to have hearings, "fact-finding" trips to successful blogging nations, and a full-time staff. Funds needed for this project will be in excess of £50 million over a 5 year period. Rumours that this commission is Peter Mandelson's way back into government have been denied by Alastair Campbell."
Aha! Now is my chance to take over the world. I just hope there's someone left to listen to my victory speech.
So Stephen Milligan was not unfaithful to wife or partner, and was an ordinary MP - being Parliamentary Private Secretary to the then Arms Minister, Jonathan Aitken, scarcely counts as cabinet office. Yet we all knew about him and his plastic bag before his body was in the coffin. No privacy for him. Normal practice in these cases is to await the inquest before releasing details of the death; but some copper wanted a moment of fame and spread the word by issuing an absurdly coy note that spoke of "unusual circumstances" and acted like a magnet to the press.
Stephen Byers, however, was unfaithful, was a big league minister when he shagged this woman, and is in every respect a better candidate for press attentions and serious discussion of What This Says About The Level of Judgement Expected From Those Entrusted With High Authority. But in this case, only the tabloid readers get any fun. Either publicize them all or none of 'em.
"Byers left his socks on till last"
1. In consideration for the lady who perhaps prefered warmed peds;
2. His big toe(s) is(are) his best feature(s) and he was prolonging her anticipatory wait (there was fourspiele involved);
3. His pedicure was booked for the morrow;
4. Contrary to the news report, no sleeping was involved; he was reducing the time required for dressing following their Act of Congress;
5. An Animal Magnet has his own rules.
Mr Briffa's commentary on the News of the World's story is frank. But even he could not bear to allude to one particular detail. A thing so cheap, so tacky, so sordid that I scarcely dare sully these pages with an account of it.
Byers left his socks on till last.
The Sydney Morning Herald headline reads, "Children at risk: rich suburbs no protection, figures show." That is what they would like you to think: that middle/upper class and working class/unemployed parents are equally likely to abuse their children. However the actual state of affairs is stated in the very first line of the article:
"A surge of child abuse reports in some of Sydney's wealthiest suburbs has dented the stereotype that child attacks and domestic violence are the sole province of the poor or disadvantaged."In other words, the incidence of child abuse among upper/middle class parents is not zero, and we are told that it is rising in the Sydney suburbs. The fact remains that, in Sydney as elsewhere, child abuse is rarer among richer than among poorer parents. As the article says,
"...And while most of the more affluent areas started from a relatively low base compared with traditionally difficult or disadvantaged areas..."To fight child abuse you must understand it. Any serious discussion of child abuse must acknowledge its correlation with one parent families, with unemployment, and with poverty. You don't have to be against welfare, as I am, to make this connection: many honest socialists quite see the point and, indeed, centre their arguments upon it. This headline-writer prefers delicately to close his or her eyes.
If you prefer to people-watch, the street scenes from Glasgow and Edinburgh also provide addictive fun. This is Buchanan Street.